What are the chances of seeing a Black-faced Antthrush in Marino Ballena National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Antthrush sighting in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, based on 21 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 208th most-seen of the 303 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-faced Antthrush in Marino Ballena National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Antthrush in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Black-faced Antthrush?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-faced Antthrush sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Marino Ballena National Park the best place to see a Black-faced Antthrush?
16th of 26
Of the 26 parks where we can rate Black-faced Antthrush sightings, Marino Ballena National Park ranks 16th at under 5%. The best odds are in Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, about 30%), Corcovado National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%) and Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Black-faced Antthrush live in Marino Ballena National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Black-faced Antthrush that you can see in Marino Ballena National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Great Kiskadee (about 80%), Tropical Kingbird (about 70%) and Scarlet-rumped Tanager (about 70%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-faced Antthrush sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-faced Antthrush is recorded against all the birds logged in Marino Ballena National Park (21 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.