What are the chances of seeing a Rufous Woodpecker in Nagarhole National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Woodpecker sighting in Nagarhole National Park on a given day, based on 147 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 133rd most-seen of the 272 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous Woodpecker in Nagarhole National Park?
February–June and September–October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Woodpecker in Nagarhole National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July–August and November–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous Woodpecker?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Nagarhole National Park the best place to see a Rufous Woodpecker?
17th of 32
Of the 32 parks where we can rate Rufous Woodpecker sightings, Nagarhole National Park ranks 17th at about 10%. The best odds are in Way Kambas National Park (Indonesia, about 30%), Khao Luang National Park (Thailand, about 20%) and Periyar National Park (India, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Rufous Woodpecker live in Nagarhole National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Rufous Woodpecker that you can see in Nagarhole National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Black-rumped Flameback (about 40%), Streak-throated Woodpecker (about 20%) and White-bellied Woodpecker (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Nagarhole National Park (147 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.