What are the chances of seeing a Hadada in Niokolo-Koba National Park?
Very likely
About 70% of wildlife watchers report a Hadada sighting in Niokolo-Koba National Park on a given day, based on 394 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 10th most-seen of the 215 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Hadada in Niokolo-Koba National Park?
January
In that month about 80% of wildlife watchers report a Hadada in Niokolo-Koba National Park on a given day, against about 40% in September, the lowest month. That is one of Niokolo-Koba National Park's driest months, with almost no rain against 300 mm in August. May–July and October have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Hadada?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hadada sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Niokolo-Koba National Park the best place to see a Hadada?
Yes
Of the 52 parks where we can rate Hadada sightings, Niokolo-Koba National Park has the highest daily chance: about 70%. Next come Nairobi National Park (Kenya, about 70%) and Addo Elephant National Park (South Africa, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Hadada live in Niokolo-Koba National Park?
Same order: Pelecaniformes
The closest relatives of the Hadada that you can see in Niokolo-Koba National Park (order Pelecaniformes, Pelicans, Herons, Ibises, and Allies) are Hamerkop (about 80%), Striated Heron (about 50%) and Black-crowned Night Heron (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Hadada sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hadada is recorded against all the birds logged in Niokolo-Koba National Park (394 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.