What are the chances of seeing a Hadada in Pilanesberg National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Hadada sighting in Pilanesberg National Park on a given day, based on 193 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 19th most-seen of the 233 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Hadada in Pilanesberg National Park?
August and September
In those months about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Hadada in Pilanesberg National Park on a given day, against about 30% in January–March and June, the lowest months. Those are among Pilanesberg National Park's driest months, with almost no rain against 130 mm in December.
What time of day is best to see a Hadada?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hadada sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Pilanesberg National Park the best place to see a Hadada?
25th of 52
Of the 52 parks where we can rate Hadada sightings, Pilanesberg National Park ranks 25th at about 40%. The best odds are in Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal, about 70%), Nairobi National Park (Kenya, about 70%) and Addo Elephant National Park (South Africa, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Hadada live in Pilanesberg National Park?
Same family: Threskiornithidae
The closest relatives of the Hadada that you can see in Pilanesberg National Park (family Threskiornithidae, Ibises and Spoonbills) are African Sacred Ibis (about 50%), African Spoonbill (about 20%) and Glossy Ibis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Hadada sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hadada is recorded against all the birds logged in Pilanesberg National Park (193 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.