What are the chances of seeing a Western Swamphen in Ranthambore National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Western Swamphen sighting in Ranthambore National Park on a given day, based on 17 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 214th most-seen of the 251 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Western Swamphen in Ranthambore National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Western Swamphen in Ranthambore National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Western Swamphen?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Western Swamphen sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Ranthambore National Park the best place to see a Western Swamphen?
27th of 38
Of the 38 parks where we can rate Western Swamphen sightings, Ranthambore National Park ranks 27th at under 5%. The best odds are in Keoladeo National Park (India, about 60%), Doñana National Park (Spain, about 40%) and Camargue (France, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Western Swamphen live in Ranthambore National Park?
Same family: Rallidae
The closest relatives of the Western Swamphen that you can see in Ranthambore National Park (family Rallidae, Rails, Gallinules, and Coots) are White-breasted Waterhen (about 60%), Common Moorhen (about 50%) and Brown Bush-hen (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Western Swamphen sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Western Swamphen is recorded against all the birds logged in Ranthambore National Park (17 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.