What are the chances of seeing a Black-faced Antthrush in San Lorenzo Protected Forest?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Antthrush sighting in San Lorenzo Protected Forest on a given day, based on 24 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 131st most-seen of the 249 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-faced Antthrush in San Lorenzo Protected Forest?
January and June
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Antthrush in San Lorenzo Protected Forest on a given day, against under 5% in November, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Black-faced Antthrush?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-faced Antthrush sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is San Lorenzo Protected Forest the best place to see a Black-faced Antthrush?
10th of 26
Of the 26 parks where we can rate Black-faced Antthrush sightings, San Lorenzo Protected Forest ranks 10th at about 10%. The best odds are in Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, about 30%), Corcovado National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%) and Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Black-faced Antthrush live in San Lorenzo Protected Forest?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Black-faced Antthrush that you can see in San Lorenzo Protected Forest (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Tropical Kingbird (about 50%), Great-tailed Grackle (about 50%) and Great Kiskadee (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-faced Antthrush sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-faced Antthrush is recorded against all the birds logged in San Lorenzo Protected Forest (24 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.