What are the chances of seeing a Pale-billed Woodpecker in Tikal National Park?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report a Pale-billed Woodpecker sighting in Tikal National Park on a given day, based on 1,088 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 18th most-seen of the 300 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pale-billed Woodpecker in Tikal National Park?
July and December–January
In those months about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Pale-billed Woodpecker in Tikal National Park on a given day, against about 30% in August and September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Pale-billed Woodpecker?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pale-billed Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tikal National Park the best place to see a Pale-billed Woodpecker?
Yes
Of the 34 parks where we can rate Pale-billed Woodpecker sightings, Tikal National Park has the highest daily chance: about 50%. Next come Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary (Belize, about 40%) and Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Pale-billed Woodpecker live in Tikal National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Pale-billed Woodpecker that you can see in Tikal National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Golden-fronted Woodpecker (about 50%), Lineated Woodpecker (about 40%) and Chestnut-colored Woodpecker (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pale-billed Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pale-billed Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Tikal National Park (1,088 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.