What are the chances of seeing a Rufous Whistler in Wilsons Promontory National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Whistler sighting in Wilsons Promontory National Park on a given day, based on 30 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 79th most-seen of the 138 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous Whistler in Wilsons Promontory National Park?
November
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Whistler in Wilsons Promontory National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–August and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous Whistler?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous Whistler sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Wilsons Promontory National Park the best place to see a Rufous Whistler?
15th of 18
Of the 18 parks where we can rate Rufous Whistler sightings, Wilsons Promontory National Park ranks 15th at about 10%. The best odds are in Flinders Ranges National Park (Australia, about 50%), Kosciuszko National Park (Australia, about 40%) and Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (Australia, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Rufous Whistler live in Wilsons Promontory National Park?
Same genus: Pachycephala
The closest relatives of the Rufous Whistler that you can see in Wilsons Promontory National Park (genus Pachycephala, Typical Whistlers) are Olive Whistler (about 20%) and Golden Whistler (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous Whistler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous Whistler is recorded against all the birds logged in Wilsons Promontory National Park (30 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.