What are the chances of seeing a Great Curassow in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Great Curassow sighting in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve on a given day, based on 185 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 63rd most-seen of the 271 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Great Curassow in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve?
February, October and December
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Great Curassow in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve on a given day, against about 10% in March and June–September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Great Curassow?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Great Curassow sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Calakmul Biosphere Reserve the best place to see a Great Curassow?
7th of 28
Of the 28 parks where we can rate Great Curassow sightings, Calakmul Biosphere Reserve ranks 7th at about 20%. The best odds are in Santa Rosa National Park (Costa Rica, about 50%), Arenal Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 50%) and Corcovado National Park (Costa Rica, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Great Curassow live in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve?
Same family: Cracidae
The closest relatives of the Great Curassow that you can see in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (family Cracidae, Guans, Chachalacas, and Curassows) are Plain Chachalaca (about 40%) and Crested Guan (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Great Curassow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Great Curassow is recorded against all the birds logged in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (185 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.