What are the chances of seeing a House Martin in Chobe National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a House Martin sighting in Chobe National Park on a given day, based on 19 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 285th most-seen of the 373 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a House Martin in Chobe National Park?
February
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a House Martin in Chobe National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March to January, the lowest months. That is one of Chobe National Park's wettest months, with about 120 mm of rain against almost none in May.
What time of day is best to see a House Martin?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most House Martin sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chobe National Park the best place to see a House Martin?
46th of 58
Of the 58 parks where we can rate House Martin sightings, Chobe National Park ranks 46th at under 5%. The best odds are in Monfragüe National Park (Spain, about 50%), Tatra National Park (Slovakia, about 50%) and Hohe Tauern National Park (Austria, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the House Martin live in Chobe National Park?
Same family: Hirundinidae
The closest relatives of the House Martin that you can see in Chobe National Park (family Hirundinidae, Swallows and Martins) are Wire-tailed Swallow (about 30%), Barn Swallow (about 20%) and Lesser Striped-Swallow (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the House Martin sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the House Martin is recorded against all the birds logged in Chobe National Park (19 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.