What are the chances of seeing a White-breasted Woodswallow in Jakarta?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a White-breasted Woodswallow sighting in Jakarta on a given day, based on 237 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 38th most-seen of the 138 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a White-breasted Woodswallow in Jakarta?
June and August
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a White-breasted Woodswallow in Jakarta on a given day, against about 10% in February and November–December, the lowest months. Those are among Jakarta's driest months, with about 75 mm of rain a month against 370 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a White-breasted Woodswallow?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most White-breasted Woodswallow sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Jakarta the best place to see a White-breasted Woodswallow?
8th of 13
Of the 13 cities where we can rate White-breasted Woodswallow sightings, Jakarta ranks 8th at about 20%. The best odds are in Davao City (Philippines, about 50%), Kuching (Malaysia, about 40%) and Denpasar (Indonesia, about 40%).
Which relatives of the White-breasted Woodswallow live in Jakarta?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the White-breasted Woodswallow that you can see in Jakarta (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Eurasian Tree Sparrow (about 80%), Yellow-vented Bulbul (about 60%) and Scarlet-headed Flowerpecker (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the White-breasted Woodswallow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White-breasted Woodswallow is recorded against all the birds logged in Jakarta (237 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.