What are the chances of seeing a Rufescent Tiger Heron in El Palmar National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufescent Tiger Heron sighting in El Palmar National Park on a given day, based on 23 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 126th most-seen of the 151 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufescent Tiger Heron in El Palmar National Park?
May
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Rufescent Tiger Heron in El Palmar National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Rufescent Tiger Heron?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufescent Tiger Heron sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is El Palmar National Park the best place to see a Rufescent Tiger Heron?
14th of 23
Of the 23 parks where we can rate Rufescent Tiger Heron sightings, El Palmar National Park ranks 14th at under 5%. The best odds are in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 80%), Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 40%) and Iberá National Park (Argentina, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Rufescent Tiger Heron live in El Palmar National Park?
Same family: Ardeidae
The closest relatives of the Rufescent Tiger Heron that you can see in El Palmar National Park (family Ardeidae, Herons, Egrets, and Bitterns) are Whistling Heron (about 20%), Cocoi Heron (about 10%) and Great Egret (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufescent Tiger Heron sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufescent Tiger Heron is recorded against all the birds logged in El Palmar National Park (23 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.