What are the chances of seeing a Barred Buttonquail in Gir National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Barred Buttonquail sighting in Gir National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 116th most-seen of the 135 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Barred Buttonquail in Gir National Park?
May
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Barred Buttonquail in Gir National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June and September–April, the lowest months. That is one of Gir National Park's driest months, with about 20 mm of rain against 330 mm in July. July and August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Barred Buttonquail?
Between 4 and 7 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Barred Buttonquail sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Gir National Park the best place to see a Barred Buttonquail?
8th of 25
Of the 25 parks where we can rate Barred Buttonquail sightings, Gir National Park ranks 8th at under 5%. The best odds are in Udawalawe National Park (Sri Lanka, about 30%), Yala National Park (Sri Lanka, about 30%) and Bali Barat National Park (Indonesia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Barred Buttonquail live in Gir National Park?
Same order: Charadriiformes
The closest relatives of the Barred Buttonquail that you can see in Gir National Park (order Charadriiformes, Shorebirds and Allies) are Red-wattled Lapwing (about 70%), River Tern (about 30%) and Indian Thick-knee (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Barred Buttonquail sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Barred Buttonquail is recorded against all the birds logged in Gir National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.