What are the chances of seeing a Red-wattled Lapwing in Kaziranga National Park?
Very likely
About 70% of wildlife watchers report a Red-wattled Lapwing sighting in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, based on 1,562 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 11th most-seen of the 323 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-wattled Lapwing in Kaziranga National Park?
April
In that month about 80% of wildlife watchers report a Red-wattled Lapwing in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, against about 50% in August, the lowest month. June and July have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Red-wattled Lapwing?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-wattled Lapwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kaziranga National Park the best place to see a Red-wattled Lapwing?
6th of 30
Of the 30 parks where we can rate Red-wattled Lapwing sightings, Kaziranga National Park ranks 6th at about 70%. The best odds are in Ranthambore National Park (India, about 80%), Yala National Park (Sri Lanka, about 80%) and Keoladeo National Park (India, about 80%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Red-wattled Lapwing live in Kaziranga National Park?
Same genus: Vanellus
The closest relatives of the Red-wattled Lapwing that you can see in Kaziranga National Park (genus Vanellus, Lapwings) are Grey-headed Lapwing (about 40%), Northern Lapwing (about 40%) and River Lapwing (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-wattled Lapwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-wattled Lapwing is recorded against all the birds logged in Kaziranga National Park (1,562 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.