What are the chances of seeing a Green Sandpiper in Kaziranga National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Green Sandpiper sighting in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, based on 702 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 59th most-seen of the 323 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Green Sandpiper in Kaziranga National Park?
November
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Green Sandpiper in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, against about 10% in May, the lowest month. That is one of Kaziranga National Park's driest months, with about 10 mm of rain against 520 mm in June. June and July have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Green Sandpiper?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Green Sandpiper sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kaziranga National Park the best place to see a Green Sandpiper?
3rd of 70
Of the 70 parks where we can rate Green Sandpiper sightings, Kaziranga National Park ranks 3rd at about 40%. The best odds are in Bale Mountains National Park (Ethiopia, about 50%) and Keoladeo National Park (India, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Green Sandpiper live in Kaziranga National Park?
Same genus: Tringa
The closest relatives of the Green Sandpiper that you can see in Kaziranga National Park (genus Tringa, Shanks, Tattlers, and Allies) are Common Greenshank (about 40%), Common Redshank (about 30%) and Wood Sandpiper (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Green Sandpiper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Green Sandpiper is recorded against all the birds logged in Kaziranga National Park (702 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.