What are the chances of seeing an Alpine Swift in Kidepo Valley National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Alpine Swift sighting in Kidepo Valley National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 297th most-seen of the 332 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Alpine Swift in Kidepo Valley National Park?
July
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Alpine Swift in Kidepo Valley National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June and August–March, the lowest months. That is one of Kidepo Valley National Park's wettest months, with about 130 mm of rain against 10 mm in February. April and May have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see an Alpine Swift?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Alpine Swift sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Kidepo Valley National Park the best place to see an Alpine Swift?
35th of 53
Of the 53 parks where we can rate Alpine Swift sightings, Kidepo Valley National Park ranks 35th at under 5%. The best odds are in Waterberg Plateau Park (Namibia, about 40%), Hohe Tauern National Park (Austria, about 20%) and Cévennes National Park (France, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Alpine Swift live in Kidepo Valley National Park?
Same family: Apodidae
The closest relatives of the Alpine Swift that you can see in Kidepo Valley National Park (family Apodidae, Swifts) are African Palm-Swift (about 50%), White-rumped Swift (about 10%) and African Swift (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Alpine Swift sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Alpine Swift is recorded against all the birds logged in Kidepo Valley National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.