What are the chances of seeing a Cinereous Tit in Royal Manas National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Cinereous Tit sighting in Royal Manas National Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 310th most-seen of the 388 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cinereous Tit in Royal Manas National Park?
February and June
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cinereous Tit in Royal Manas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–May, July and October–January, the lowest months. August and September have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Cinereous Tit?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cinereous Tit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Royal Manas National Park the best place to see a Cinereous Tit?
29th of 29
Of the 29 parks where we can rate Cinereous Tit sightings, Royal Manas National Park ranks 29th at under 5%. The best odds are in Nikko National Park (Japan, about 80%), Horton Plains National Park (Sri Lanka, about 70%) and Ranthambore National Park (India, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Cinereous Tit live in Royal Manas National Park?
Same genus: Parus
The closest relatives of the Cinereous Tit that you can see in Royal Manas National Park (genus Parus, Great Tits and Allies) are Green-backed Tit (about 20%) and Yellow-cheeked Tit (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cinereous Tit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cinereous Tit is recorded against all the birds logged in Royal Manas National Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.