What are the chances of seeing an Alpine Swift in Waterberg Plateau Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report an Alpine Swift sighting in Waterberg Plateau Park on a given day, based on 55 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 23rd most-seen of the 118 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Alpine Swift in Waterberg Plateau Park?
January, August and November
In those months about 50% of wildlife watchers report an Alpine Swift in Waterberg Plateau Park on a given day, against about 20% in October, the lowest month. Those are among Waterberg Plateau Park's wettest months, with about 45 mm of rain a month against almost none in May. April and June have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see an Alpine Swift?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Alpine Swift sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Waterberg Plateau Park the best place to see an Alpine Swift?
Yes
Of the 53 parks where we can rate Alpine Swift sightings, Waterberg Plateau Park has the highest daily chance: about 40%. Next come Hohe Tauern National Park (Austria, about 20%) and Cévennes National Park (France, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Alpine Swift live in Waterberg Plateau Park?
Same family: Apodidae
The closest relatives of the Alpine Swift that you can see in Waterberg Plateau Park (family Apodidae, Swifts) are Bradfield's Swift (about 30%), Common Swift (about 10%) and Little Swift (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Alpine Swift sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Alpine Swift is recorded against all the birds logged in Waterberg Plateau Park (55 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.