What are the chances of seeing a Cinereous Tit in Yala National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Cinereous Tit sighting in Yala National Park on a given day, based on 26 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 170th most-seen of the 220 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cinereous Tit in Yala National Park?
June
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cinereous Tit in Yala National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July to May, the lowest months. That is one of Yala National Park's driest months, with about 35 mm of rain against 340 mm in November.
What time of day is best to see a Cinereous Tit?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cinereous Tit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Yala National Park the best place to see a Cinereous Tit?
27th of 29
Of the 29 parks where we can rate Cinereous Tit sightings, Yala National Park ranks 27th at under 5%. The best odds are in Nikko National Park (Japan, about 80%), Horton Plains National Park (Sri Lanka, about 70%) and Ranthambore National Park (India, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Cinereous Tit live in Yala National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Cinereous Tit that you can see in Yala National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Indian Robin (about 80%), White-browed Fantail (about 60%) and Oriental Magpie-Robin (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cinereous Tit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cinereous Tit is recorded against all the birds logged in Yala National Park (26 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.