What are the chances of seeing a Jacobin Cuckoo in Bandhavgarh National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Jacobin Cuckoo sighting in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 207th most-seen of the 241 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Jacobin Cuckoo in Bandhavgarh National Park?
June and July
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Jacobin Cuckoo in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August to May, the lowest months. Those are among Bandhavgarh National Park's wettest months, with about 250 mm of rain a month against almost none in November.
What time of day is best to see a Jacobin Cuckoo?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Jacobin Cuckoo sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Bandhavgarh National Park the best place to see a Jacobin Cuckoo?
47th of 55
Of the 55 parks where we can rate Jacobin Cuckoo sightings, Bandhavgarh National Park ranks 47th at under 5%. The best odds are in Udawalawe National Park (Sri Lanka, about 30%), Tsavo West National Park (Kenya, about 20%) and Meru National Park (Kenya, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Jacobin Cuckoo live in Bandhavgarh National Park?
Same family: Cuculidae
The closest relatives of the Jacobin Cuckoo that you can see in Bandhavgarh National Park (family Cuculidae, Cuckoos) are Greater Coucal (about 50%), Common Hawk-Cuckoo (about 40%) and Indian Cuckoo (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Jacobin Cuckoo sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Jacobin Cuckoo is recorded against all the birds logged in Bandhavgarh National Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.