What are the chances of seeing a Worm-eating Warbler in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Worm-eating Warbler sighting in Celestún Biosphere Reserve on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 260th most-seen of the 297 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Worm-eating Warbler in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Worm-eating Warbler in Celestún Biosphere Reserve on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Worm-eating Warbler?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Worm-eating Warbler sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Celestún Biosphere Reserve the best place to see a Worm-eating Warbler?
27th of 38
Of the 38 parks where we can rate Worm-eating Warbler sightings, Celestún Biosphere Reserve ranks 27th at under 5%. The best odds are in Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park (Jamaica, about 20%), Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 20%) and Biotopo Cerro Cahuí (Guatemala, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Worm-eating Warbler live in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
Same family: Parulidae
The closest relatives of the Worm-eating Warbler that you can see in Celestún Biosphere Reserve (family Parulidae, New World Warblers) are Yellow Warbler (about 60%), Northern Waterthrush (about 40%) and Northern Parula (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Worm-eating Warbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Worm-eating Warbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Celestún Biosphere Reserve (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.