What are the chances of seeing a Stork-billed Kingfisher in Chattogram?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Stork-billed Kingfisher sighting in Chattogram on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 35th most-seen of the 76 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Stork-billed Kingfisher in Chattogram?
November
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Stork-billed Kingfisher in Chattogram on a given day, against about 10% in February, June, October and December, the lowest months. That is one of Chattogram's driest months, with about 55 mm of rain against 780 mm in July. April and July–August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Stork-billed Kingfisher?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Stork-billed Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Chattogram the best place to see a Stork-billed Kingfisher?
7th of 28
Of the 28 cities where we can rate Stork-billed Kingfisher sightings, Chattogram ranks 7th at about 20%. The best odds are in Tamluk (India, about 40%), Savar (Bangladesh, about 30%) and Ponnani (India, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Stork-billed Kingfisher live in Chattogram?
Same family: Alcedinidae
The closest relatives of the Stork-billed Kingfisher that you can see in Chattogram (family Alcedinidae, Kingfishers) are White-throated Kingfisher (about 50%) and Common Kingfisher (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Stork-billed Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Stork-billed Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Chattogram (12 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.