What are the chances of seeing a House Martin in Etosha National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a House Martin sighting in Etosha National Park on a given day, based on 18 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 209th most-seen of the 260 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a House Martin in Etosha National Park?
October
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a House Martin in Etosha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in November to September, the lowest months. That is one of Etosha National Park's driest months, with almost no rain against 75 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see a House Martin?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most House Martin sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Etosha National Park the best place to see a House Martin?
49th of 58
Of the 58 parks where we can rate House Martin sightings, Etosha National Park ranks 49th at under 5%. The best odds are in Monfragüe National Park (Spain, about 50%), Tatra National Park (Slovakia, about 50%) and Hohe Tauern National Park (Austria, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the House Martin live in Etosha National Park?
Same family: Hirundinidae
The closest relatives of the House Martin that you can see in Etosha National Park (family Hirundinidae, Swallows and Martins) are Rock Martin (about 30%), Rufous-chested Swallow (about 20%) and Barn Swallow (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the House Martin sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the House Martin is recorded against all the birds logged in Etosha National Park (18 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.