What are the chances of seeing a Swallow Tanager in Itatiaia National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Swallow Tanager sighting in Itatiaia National Park on a given day, based on 728 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 51st most-seen of the 352 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Swallow Tanager in Itatiaia National Park?
September
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Swallow Tanager in Itatiaia National Park on a given day, against about 10% in January and June, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Swallow Tanager?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Swallow Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Itatiaia National Park the best place to see a Swallow Tanager?
4th of 19
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Swallow Tanager sightings, Itatiaia National Park ranks 4th at about 40%. The best odds are in Chapada dos Guimarães National Park (Brazil, about 50%), Sierra de la Macarena National Park (Colombia, about 40%) and Serra da Canastra National Park (Brazil, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Swallow Tanager live in Itatiaia National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Swallow Tanager that you can see in Itatiaia National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Saffron Finch (about 60%), Sayaca Tanager (about 60%) and Green-winged Saltator (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Swallow Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Swallow Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Itatiaia National Park (728 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.