What are the chances of seeing a Cinereous Tit in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Cinereous Tit sighting in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, based on 17 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 136th most-seen of the 203 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cinereous Tit in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
February
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cinereous Tit in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March to December, the lowest months. January has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Cinereous Tit?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cinereous Tit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kerinci Seblat National Park the best place to see a Cinereous Tit?
26th of 29
Of the 29 parks where we can rate Cinereous Tit sightings, Kerinci Seblat National Park ranks 26th at under 5%. The best odds are in Nikko National Park (Japan, about 80%), Horton Plains National Park (Sri Lanka, about 70%) and Ranthambore National Park (India, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Cinereous Tit live in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Cinereous Tit that you can see in Kerinci Seblat National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher (about 70%), Gray-throated Babbler (about 60%) and Golden Babbler (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cinereous Tit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cinereous Tit is recorded against all the birds logged in Kerinci Seblat National Park (17 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.