What are the chances of seeing a Hairy Woodpecker in Kluane National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Hairy Woodpecker sighting in Kluane National Park on a given day, based on 342 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 8th most-seen of the 129 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Hairy Woodpecker in Kluane National Park?
December
In that month about 90% of wildlife watchers report a Hairy Woodpecker in Kluane National Park on a given day, against about 20% in June and July, the lowest months. That is one of Kluane National Park's wettest months, with about 160 mm of rain against 45 mm in April.
What time of day is best to see a Hairy Woodpecker?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hairy Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kluane National Park the best place to see a Hairy Woodpecker?
Yes
Of the 51 parks where we can rate Hairy Woodpecker sightings, Kluane National Park has the highest daily chance: about 40%. Next come Yosemite National Park (United States, about 40%) and Rocky Mountain National Park (United States, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Hairy Woodpecker live in Kluane National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Hairy Woodpecker that you can see in Kluane National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Northern Flicker (about 30%), Downy Woodpecker (about 30%) and Yellow-bellied Sapsucker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Hairy Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hairy Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Kluane National Park (342 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.