What are the chances of seeing a Common Ground-Dove in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Common Ground-Dove sighting in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, based on 33 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 182nd most-seen of the 325 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Ground-Dove in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Common Ground-Dove in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Common Ground-Dove?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Ground-Dove sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manuel Antonio National Park the best place to see a Common Ground-Dove?
32nd of 41
Of the 41 parks where we can rate Common Ground-Dove sightings, Manuel Antonio National Park ranks 32nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Cabo Pulmo National Park (Mexico, about 40%), Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park (Jamaica, about 40%) and Bahía de Loreto National Park (Mexico, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Common Ground-Dove live in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Same genus: Columbina
The closest relatives of the Common Ground-Dove that you can see in Manuel Antonio National Park (genus Columbina, Small Ground Doves) are Inca Dove (about 30%) and Ruddy Ground-Dove (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Ground-Dove sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Ground-Dove is recorded against all the birds logged in Manuel Antonio National Park (33 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.