What are the chances of seeing a Blue Ground-Dove in Manuel Antonio National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Blue Ground-Dove sighting in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, based on 212 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 72nd most-seen of the 325 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue Ground-Dove in Manuel Antonio National Park?
April, September and December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Blue Ground-Dove in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Blue Ground-Dove?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue Ground-Dove sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manuel Antonio National Park the best place to see a Blue Ground-Dove?
8th of 40
Of the 40 parks where we can rate Blue Ground-Dove sightings, Manuel Antonio National Park ranks 8th at about 10%. The best odds are in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 20%), Piedras Blancas National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%) and Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Blue Ground-Dove live in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Same family: Columbidae
The closest relatives of the Blue Ground-Dove that you can see in Manuel Antonio National Park (family Columbidae, Pigeons and Doves) are Inca Dove (about 30%), Pale-vented Pigeon (about 30%) and White-tipped Dove (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue Ground-Dove sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue Ground-Dove is recorded against all the birds logged in Manuel Antonio National Park (212 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.