What are the chances of seeing a Worm-eating Warbler in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Worm-eating Warbler sighting in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, based on 28 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 201st most-seen of the 325 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Worm-eating Warbler in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Worm-eating Warbler in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Worm-eating Warbler?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Worm-eating Warbler sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manuel Antonio National Park the best place to see a Worm-eating Warbler?
21st of 38
Of the 38 parks where we can rate Worm-eating Warbler sightings, Manuel Antonio National Park ranks 21st at under 5%. The best odds are in Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park (Jamaica, about 20%), Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 20%) and Biotopo Cerro Cahuí (Guatemala, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Worm-eating Warbler live in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Same family: Parulidae
The closest relatives of the Worm-eating Warbler that you can see in Manuel Antonio National Park (family Parulidae, New World Warblers) are Yellow Warbler (about 20%), Chestnut-sided Warbler (about 20%) and Northern Waterthrush (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Worm-eating Warbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Worm-eating Warbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Manuel Antonio National Park (28 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.