What are the chances of seeing a Stork-billed Kingfisher in Minneriya National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Stork-billed Kingfisher sighting in Minneriya National Park on a given day, based on 154 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 55th most-seen of the 155 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Stork-billed Kingfisher in Minneriya National Park?
April
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Stork-billed Kingfisher in Minneriya National Park on a given day, against about 10% in September, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Stork-billed Kingfisher?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Stork-billed Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Minneriya National Park the best place to see a Stork-billed Kingfisher?
9th of 33
Of the 33 parks where we can rate Stork-billed Kingfisher sightings, Minneriya National Park ranks 9th at about 20%. The best odds are in Tanjung Puting National Park (Indonesia, about 80%), Kinabatangan Wildlife Sanctuary (Malaysia, about 70%) and Royal Bardia National Park (Nepal, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Stork-billed Kingfisher live in Minneriya National Park?
Same family: Alcedinidae
The closest relatives of the Stork-billed Kingfisher that you can see in Minneriya National Park (family Alcedinidae, Kingfishers) are White-throated Kingfisher (about 60%) and Common Kingfisher (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Stork-billed Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Stork-billed Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Minneriya National Park (154 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.