What are the chances of seeing a Hairy Woodpecker in Olympic National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Hairy Woodpecker sighting in Olympic National Park on a given day, based on 1,070 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 36th most-seen of the 216 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Hairy Woodpecker in Olympic National Park?
March to September
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Hairy Woodpecker in Olympic National Park on a given day, against about 10% in October to February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Hairy Woodpecker?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hairy Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Olympic National Park the best place to see a Hairy Woodpecker?
21st of 51
Of the 51 parks where we can rate Hairy Woodpecker sightings, Olympic National Park ranks 21st at about 20%. The best odds are in Kluane National Park (Canada, about 40%), Yosemite National Park (United States, about 40%) and Rocky Mountain National Park (United States, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Hairy Woodpecker live in Olympic National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Hairy Woodpecker that you can see in Olympic National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Northern Flicker (about 30%), Downy Woodpecker (about 10%) and Pileated Woodpecker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Hairy Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hairy Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Olympic National Park (1,070 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.