What are the chances of seeing a Whinchat in Plitvice Lakes National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Whinchat sighting in Plitvice Lakes National Park on a given day, based on 17 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 56th most-seen of the 76 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Whinchat in Plitvice Lakes National Park?
May and June
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Whinchat in Plitvice Lakes National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–April and July–November, the lowest months. December to February have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Whinchat?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Whinchat sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Plitvice Lakes National Park the best place to see a Whinchat?
17th of 43
Of the 43 parks where we can rate Whinchat sightings, Plitvice Lakes National Park ranks 17th at under 5%. The best odds are in Mercantour National Park (France, about 40%), Vanoise National Park (France, about 40%) and Kidepo Valley National Park (Uganda, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Whinchat live in Plitvice Lakes National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Whinchat that you can see in Plitvice Lakes National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are European Robin (about 80%), Black Redstart (about 40%) and Collared Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Whinchat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Whinchat is recorded against all the birds logged in Plitvice Lakes National Park (17 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.