What are the chances of seeing an Alpine Swift in South Luangwa National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Alpine Swift sighting in South Luangwa National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 219th most-seen of the 257 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Alpine Swift in South Luangwa National Park?
August
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Alpine Swift in South Luangwa National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to July, the lowest months. That is one of South Luangwa National Park's driest months, with almost no rain against 310 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see an Alpine Swift?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Alpine Swift sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is South Luangwa National Park the best place to see an Alpine Swift?
34th of 53
Of the 53 parks where we can rate Alpine Swift sightings, South Luangwa National Park ranks 34th at under 5%. The best odds are in Waterberg Plateau Park (Namibia, about 40%), Hohe Tauern National Park (Austria, about 20%) and Cévennes National Park (France, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Alpine Swift live in South Luangwa National Park?
Same family: Apodidae
The closest relatives of the Alpine Swift that you can see in South Luangwa National Park (family Apodidae, Swifts) are African Palm-Swift (about 30%), Little Swift (about 10%) and Horus Swift (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Alpine Swift sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Alpine Swift is recorded against all the birds logged in South Luangwa National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.