What are the chances of seeing a Little Swift in South Luangwa National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Little Swift sighting in South Luangwa National Park on a given day, based on 73 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 105th most-seen of the 257 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Little Swift in South Luangwa National Park?
May and August
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Little Swift in South Luangwa National Park on a given day, against under 5% in November, the lowest month. Those are among South Luangwa National Park's driest months, with almost no rain against 310 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see a Little Swift?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Little Swift sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is South Luangwa National Park the best place to see a Little Swift?
38th of 74
Of the 74 parks where we can rate Little Swift sightings, South Luangwa National Park ranks 38th at about 10%. The best odds are in Minneriya National Park (Sri Lanka, about 50%), Nairobi National Park (Kenya, about 50%) and Kruger National Park (South Africa, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Little Swift live in South Luangwa National Park?
Same genus: Apus
The closest relatives of the Little Swift that you can see in South Luangwa National Park (genus Apus, Typical Swifts) are Horus Swift (about 10%) and White-rumped Swift (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Little Swift sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Little Swift is recorded against all the birds logged in South Luangwa National Park (73 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.