What are the chances of seeing a Swallow Tanager in Tayrona National Natural Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Swallow Tanager sighting in Tayrona National Natural Park on a given day, based on 19 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 211th most-seen of the 285 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Swallow Tanager in Tayrona National Natural Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Swallow Tanager in Tayrona National Natural Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Swallow Tanager?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Swallow Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tayrona National Natural Park the best place to see a Swallow Tanager?
18th of 19
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Swallow Tanager sightings, Tayrona National Natural Park ranks 18th at under 5%. The best odds are in Chapada dos Guimarães National Park (Brazil, about 50%), Sierra de la Macarena National Park (Colombia, about 40%) and Serra da Canastra National Park (Brazil, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Swallow Tanager live in Tayrona National Natural Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Swallow Tanager that you can see in Tayrona National Natural Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Blue-gray Tanager (about 70%), Crimson-backed Tanager (about 50%) and Palm Tanager (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Swallow Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Swallow Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Tayrona National Natural Park (19 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.