What are the chances of seeing a Crested Hawk-Eagle in Yala National Park?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report a Crested Hawk-Eagle sighting in Yala National Park on a given day, based on 660 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 34th most-seen of the 220 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Crested Hawk-Eagle in Yala National Park?
February, May and November
In those months about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Crested Hawk-Eagle in Yala National Park on a given day, against about 30% in August, the lowest month. Those are among Yala National Park's wettest months, with about 190 mm of rain a month against 35 mm in June.
What time of day is best to see a Crested Hawk-Eagle?
Between 4 and 7 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Crested Hawk-Eagle sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Yala National Park the best place to see a Crested Hawk-Eagle?
2nd of 34
Of the 34 parks where we can rate Crested Hawk-Eagle sightings, Yala National Park ranks 2nd at about 50%. The best odds are in Udawalawe National Park (Sri Lanka, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Crested Hawk-Eagle live in Yala National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Crested Hawk-Eagle that you can see in Yala National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Brahminy Kite (about 70%), White-Bellied Sea-Eagle (about 50%) and Crested Serpent Eagle (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Crested Hawk-Eagle sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Crested Hawk-Eagle is recorded against all the birds logged in Yala National Park (660 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.