What are the chances of seeing a Northern Jacana in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Northern Jacana sighting in Celestún Biosphere Reserve on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 244th most-seen of the 297 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Northern Jacana in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Northern Jacana in Celestún Biosphere Reserve on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Northern Jacana?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Northern Jacana sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Celestún Biosphere Reserve the best place to see a Northern Jacana?
31st of 32
Of the 32 parks where we can rate Northern Jacana sightings, Celestún Biosphere Reserve ranks 31st at under 5%. The best odds are in Palo Verde National Park (Costa Rica, about 70%), Tortuguero National Park (Costa Rica, about 60%) and Lago de Yojoa (Honduras, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Northern Jacana live in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
Same order: Charadriiformes
The closest relatives of the Northern Jacana that you can see in Celestún Biosphere Reserve (order Charadriiformes, Shorebirds and Allies) are Laughing Gull (about 70%), Black-necked Stilt (about 50%) and Willet (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Northern Jacana sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Northern Jacana is recorded against all the birds logged in Celestún Biosphere Reserve (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.