What are the chances of seeing a Northern Parula in Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Northern Parula sighting in Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park on a given day, based on 892 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 22nd most-seen of the 205 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Northern Parula in Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park?
November and December
In those months about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Northern Parula in Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park on a given day, against about 10% in May to July, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Northern Parula?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Northern Parula sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park the best place to see a Northern Parula?
5th of 39
Of the 39 parks where we can rate Northern Parula sightings, Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park ranks 5th at about 40%. The best odds are in Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park (Jamaica, about 60%), Ciénaga de Zapata (Cuba, about 50%) and Congaree National Park (United States, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Northern Parula live in Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park?
Same genus: Setophaga
The closest relatives of the Northern Parula that you can see in Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park (genus Setophaga, Setophaga Warblers) are Yellow Warbler (about 80%), American Redstart (about 60%) and Palm Warbler (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Northern Parula sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Northern Parula is recorded against all the birds logged in Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park (892 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.