What are the chances of seeing a Rufous Woodpecker in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Woodpecker sighting in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 148th most-seen of the 203 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous Woodpecker in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
February and March
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Woodpecker in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to December, the lowest months. January has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous Woodpecker?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Kerinci Seblat National Park the best place to see a Rufous Woodpecker?
29th of 32
Of the 32 parks where we can rate Rufous Woodpecker sightings, Kerinci Seblat National Park ranks 29th at under 5%. The best odds are in Way Kambas National Park (Indonesia, about 30%), Khao Luang National Park (Thailand, about 20%) and Periyar National Park (India, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Rufous Woodpecker live in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Rufous Woodpecker that you can see in Kerinci Seblat National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Maroon Woodpecker (about 20%), Greater Yellownape (about 20%) and Lesser Yellownape (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Kerinci Seblat National Park (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.