What are the chances of seeing a Boat-billed Heron in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Boat-billed Heron sighting in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, based on 64 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 151st most-seen of the 325 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Boat-billed Heron in Manuel Antonio National Park?
April and October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Boat-billed Heron in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–September and November–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Boat-billed Heron?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Boat-billed Heron sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manuel Antonio National Park the best place to see a Boat-billed Heron?
22nd of 37
Of the 37 parks where we can rate Boat-billed Heron sightings, Manuel Antonio National Park ranks 22nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 40%), Palo Verde National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%) and Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Boat-billed Heron live in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Same family: Ardeidae
The closest relatives of the Boat-billed Heron that you can see in Manuel Antonio National Park (family Ardeidae, Herons, Egrets, and Bitterns) are Green Heron (about 20%), Bare-throated Tiger Heron (about 20%) and Great Egret (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Boat-billed Heron sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Boat-billed Heron is recorded against all the birds logged in Manuel Antonio National Park (64 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.