What are the chances of seeing an Alpine Swift in Mudumalai National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Alpine Swift sighting in Mudumalai National Park on a given day, based on 80 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 125th most-seen of the 233 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Alpine Swift in Mudumalai National Park?
May
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Alpine Swift in Mudumalai National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, June, October and December, the lowest months. That is one of Mudumalai National Park's wettest months, with about 170 mm of rain against 10 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see an Alpine Swift?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Alpine Swift sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Mudumalai National Park the best place to see an Alpine Swift?
10th of 53
Of the 53 parks where we can rate Alpine Swift sightings, Mudumalai National Park ranks 10th at about 10%. The best odds are in Waterberg Plateau Park (Namibia, about 40%), Hohe Tauern National Park (Austria, about 20%) and Cévennes National Park (France, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Alpine Swift live in Mudumalai National Park?
Same family: Apodidae
The closest relatives of the Alpine Swift that you can see in Mudumalai National Park (family Apodidae, Swifts) are Indian Swiftlet (about 30%), Little Swift (about 20%) and Asian Palm-Swift (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Alpine Swift sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Alpine Swift is recorded against all the birds logged in Mudumalai National Park (80 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.