What are the chances of seeing an Ashy Drongo in Namdapha National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report an Ashy Drongo sighting in Namdapha National Park on a given day, based on 654 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 12th most-seen of the 298 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Ashy Drongo in Namdapha National Park?
January
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report an Ashy Drongo in Namdapha National Park on a given day, against about 30% in March, the lowest month. That is one of Namdapha National Park's driest months, with about 50 mm of rain against 660 mm in July. June to September have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see an Ashy Drongo?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ashy Drongo sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Namdapha National Park the best place to see an Ashy Drongo?
5th of 33
Of the 33 parks where we can rate Ashy Drongo sightings, Namdapha National Park ranks 5th at about 40%. The best odds are in Cat Tien National Park (Vietnam, about 70%), Kinabalu Park (Malaysia, about 50%) and Kaeng Krachan National Park (Thailand, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Ashy Drongo live in Namdapha National Park?
Same genus: Dicrurus
The closest relatives of the Ashy Drongo that you can see in Namdapha National Park (genus Dicrurus, Drongos) are Bronzed Drongo (about 50%), Lesser Racket-tailed Drongo (about 40%) and Greater Racket-tailed Drongo (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ashy Drongo sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ashy Drongo is recorded against all the birds logged in Namdapha National Park (654 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.