What are the chances of seeing a Northern Parula in Pico Bonito National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Northern Parula sighting in Pico Bonito National Park on a given day, based on 56 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 137th most-seen of the 271 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Northern Parula in Pico Bonito National Park?
February
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Northern Parula in Pico Bonito National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March to November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Northern Parula?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Northern Parula sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Pico Bonito National Park the best place to see a Northern Parula?
20th of 39
Of the 39 parks where we can rate Northern Parula sightings, Pico Bonito National Park ranks 20th at about 10%. The best odds are in Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park (Jamaica, about 60%), Ciénaga de Zapata (Cuba, about 50%) and Congaree National Park (United States, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Northern Parula live in Pico Bonito National Park?
Same genus: Setophaga
The closest relatives of the Northern Parula that you can see in Pico Bonito National Park (genus Setophaga, Setophaga Warblers) are Magnolia Warbler (about 40%), Chestnut-sided Warbler (about 40%) and American Redstart (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Northern Parula sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Northern Parula is recorded against all the birds logged in Pico Bonito National Park (56 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.