What are the chances of seeing a Swallow Tanager in Podocarpus National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Swallow Tanager sighting in Podocarpus National Park on a given day, based on 204 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 98th most-seen of the 446 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Swallow Tanager in Podocarpus National Park?
September and November–March
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Swallow Tanager in Podocarpus National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Swallow Tanager?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Swallow Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Podocarpus National Park the best place to see a Swallow Tanager?
9th of 19
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Swallow Tanager sightings, Podocarpus National Park ranks 9th at about 10%. The best odds are in Chapada dos Guimarães National Park (Brazil, about 50%), Sierra de la Macarena National Park (Colombia, about 40%) and Serra da Canastra National Park (Brazil, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Swallow Tanager live in Podocarpus National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Swallow Tanager that you can see in Podocarpus National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Lacrimose Mountain-Tanager (about 40%), Masked Flowerpiercer (about 40%) and Blue-necked Tanager (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Swallow Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Swallow Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Podocarpus National Park (204 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.