What are the chances of seeing a Thoas Swallowtail in Tijuca National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Thoas Swallowtail sighting in Tijuca National Park on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 38th most-seen of the 132 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Thoas Swallowtail in Tijuca National Park?
September–October and December–May
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Thoas Swallowtail in Tijuca National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June–August and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Thoas Swallowtail?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Thoas Swallowtail sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tijuca National Park the best place to see a Thoas Swallowtail?
26th of 28
Of the 28 parks where we can rate Thoas Swallowtail sightings, Tijuca National Park ranks 26th at about 10%. The best odds are in Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 50%), Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 40%) and Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Thoas Swallowtail live in Tijuca National Park?
Same family: Papilionidae
The closest relatives of the Thoas Swallowtail that you can see in Tijuca National Park (family Papilionidae, Swallowtails and Parnassians) are Parides tros (about 10%) and Fluminense Swallowtail (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Thoas Swallowtail sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Thoas Swallowtail is recorded against all the insects logged in Tijuca National Park (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.