What are the chances of seeing a Guatemalan Paltry Tyrannulet in Chagres National Park?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report a Guatemalan Paltry Tyrannulet sighting in Chagres National Park on a given day, based on 925 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 19th most-seen of the 372 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Guatemalan Paltry Tyrannulet in Chagres National Park?
May–June, September and November–December
In those months about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Guatemalan Paltry Tyrannulet in Chagres National Park on a given day, against about 40% in January, August and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Guatemalan Paltry Tyrannulet?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Guatemalan Paltry Tyrannulet sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chagres National Park the best place to see a Guatemalan Paltry Tyrannulet?
Yes
Of the 32 parks where we can rate Guatemalan Paltry Tyrannulet sightings, Chagres National Park has the highest daily chance: about 50%. Next come Chirripó National Park (Costa Rica, about 40%) and El Triunfo (Mexico, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Guatemalan Paltry Tyrannulet live in Chagres National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Guatemalan Paltry Tyrannulet that you can see in Chagres National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 40%), Scale-crested Pygmy-Tyrant (about 40%) and Dusky-capped Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Guatemalan Paltry Tyrannulet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Guatemalan Paltry Tyrannulet is recorded against all the birds logged in Chagres National Park (925 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.