What are the chances of seeing a Yellow Tyrannulet in Chagres National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow Tyrannulet sighting in Chagres National Park on a given day, based on 60 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 189th most-seen of the 372 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Yellow Tyrannulet in Chagres National Park?
February–June and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow Tyrannulet in Chagres National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January and July–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Yellow Tyrannulet?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Yellow Tyrannulet sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chagres National Park the best place to see a Yellow Tyrannulet?
11th of 29
Of the 29 parks where we can rate Yellow Tyrannulet sightings, Chagres National Park ranks 11th at under 5%. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 20%), Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 20%) and San Lorenzo Protected Forest (Panama, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Yellow Tyrannulet live in Chagres National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Yellow Tyrannulet that you can see in Chagres National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Guatemalan Paltry Tyrannulet (about 50%), Tropical Kingbird (about 40%) and Scale-crested Pygmy-Tyrant (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Yellow Tyrannulet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Yellow Tyrannulet is recorded against all the birds logged in Chagres National Park (60 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.