What are the chances of seeing a Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift in Darién National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift sighting in Darién National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 265th most-seen of the 397 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift in Darién National Park?
April and December–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift in Darién National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March and May–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Darién National Park the best place to see a Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift?
13th of 35
Of the 35 parks where we can rate Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift sightings, Darién National Park ranks 13th at under 5%. The best odds are in Bastimentos Island National Marine Park (Panama, about 20%), Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 10%) and Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift live in Darién National Park?
Same family: Apodidae
The closest relatives of the Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift that you can see in Darién National Park (family Apodidae, Swifts) are Band-rumped Swift (about 10%) and White-collared Swift (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift is recorded against all the birds logged in Darién National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.