What are the chances of seeing a Bay-headed Tanager in Los Quetzales National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Bay-headed Tanager sighting in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, based on 30 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 174th most-seen of the 252 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bay-headed Tanager in Los Quetzales National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Bay-headed Tanager in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Bay-headed Tanager?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bay-headed Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Los Quetzales National Park the best place to see a Bay-headed Tanager?
29th of 29
Of the 29 parks where we can rate Bay-headed Tanager sightings, Los Quetzales National Park ranks 29th at under 5%. The best odds are in Chagres National Park (Panama, about 70%), Henri Pittier National Park (Venezuela, about 50%) and Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (Colombia, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Bay-headed Tanager live in Los Quetzales National Park?
Same genus: Tangara
The closest relatives of the Bay-headed Tanager that you can see in Los Quetzales National Park (genus Tangara, Tangara Tanagers) are Silver-throated Tanager (about 40%) and Spangle-cheeked Tanager (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bay-headed Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bay-headed Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Los Quetzales National Park (30 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.