What are the chances of seeing a Brown Jay in Marino Ballena National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Brown Jay sighting in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, based on 221 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 68th most-seen of the 303 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Brown Jay in Marino Ballena National Park?
October
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Brown Jay in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, against about 10% in June–August and November–April, the lowest months. That is one of Marino Ballena National Park's wettest months, with about 920 mm of rain against 110 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Brown Jay?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Brown Jay sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Marino Ballena National Park the best place to see a Brown Jay?
18th of 35
Of the 35 parks where we can rate Brown Jay sightings, Marino Ballena National Park ranks 18th at about 10%. The best odds are in Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 90%), Pico Bonito National Park (Honduras, about 70%) and Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Brown Jay live in Marino Ballena National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Brown Jay that you can see in Marino Ballena National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Great Kiskadee (about 80%), Tropical Kingbird (about 70%) and Scarlet-rumped Tanager (about 70%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Brown Jay sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Brown Jay is recorded against all the birds logged in Marino Ballena National Park (221 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.